Congra Immigration Services Inc.'s goal is to monitor clients' immigration matters from the beginning to the completion of the visa process and to proceed with court matters when necessary. It is highly recommended to use a professional immigration consultant or immigration lawyer with knowledge and experience in Canadian immigration programs to receive the advice and support needed to bring a case to a successful conclusion. A future in Canada awaits, and every opportunity counts.

The company values each customer and takes the time to review their individual circumstances, offering tailored advice and solutions.

As a dynamic and flexible office, Congra Immigration Services Inc. is prepared to thoroughly examine each case and its needs, providing legal solutions tailored to meet those needs.

The main goal is to offer clients the best immigration services and professional legal advice. However, the office provides more than just immigration advice and representation in Canadian immigration matters.

As a modern office with expert associate consultants and lawyers, Congra Immigration Services Inc. pays special attention to details. They are flexible and dynamic in their approach to each immigration case, and their working method is oriented towards quickly and efficiently solving problems.

A detailed analysis of the immigration situation, along with an interdisciplinary association of different areas of law, helps the firm arrive at optimal solutions and provide the best immigration services.

The founder of Congra Immigration Services Inc. is Khrystyna Naydan. Her passion for immigration comes from a desire to help people, assist companies, and pursue a rewarding career in the legal field. Khrystyna holds a bachelor's degree with distinction in History and Psychology from the University of Alberta and a graduate diploma from Ashton College in the Canadian immigration and citizenship law program, which led to her professional designation as a licensed immigration practitioner.

During her university studies, Khrystyna wrote an analytical paper entitled 'Making and Telling Stories of Real-Life Events: Narrative Structure in Courtroom Testimony.' In this paper, she examined how narrative structure persists in real-life events and the stories people tell. Specifically, she analyzed courtroom testimony from the inquiry into the wrongful conviction of David Milgard (2005-2006) to illustrate how individuals make sense of the fragmented nature of their memories by organizing them into collective narratives that support their beliefs and allegations. This approach is mirrored in their immigration cases, where they aim to create well-formulated narratives that are logical, easy to follow, and grounded in immigration law, while avoiding the pitfalls of prefabricated narratives that may not be relevant to every matter.